Question · asked by 1 review
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU: Leaving the study early
- Population
- Adolescents with psychosis
- Intervention
- COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU)
- Comparison
- TAU
- Outcome
- Leaving the study early
It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU (all short‐term) Leaving the study early: For any reason · Adolescents with psychosis It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty). Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.93 [0.32, 2.71] | 2 studies · 91 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.