Question · asked by 1 review
High edentulism prevalence vs Not applicable: Oral health-related quality of life
- Population
- people aged 60 years and older living in the community
- Intervention
- High edentulism prevalence
- Comparison
- Not applicable
- Outcome
- Oral health-related quality of life
No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by edentulism prevalence.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High edentulism prevalence vs Not applicable OHRQoL sum score transformed to 0-100 · Community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older · Baseline for longitudinal studies, Community, High edentulism prevalence No statistically significant difference in OHRQoL was reported by edentulism prevalence. Association between oral health-related quality of life and structural determinants of health among elderly… (2025) All outcomes | There were no statistically significant differences reported in the OHRQoL sum scores based on prevalence of edentulism. | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Association between oral health-related quality of life and structural determinants of health among elderly populations. a systematic… 2025 All outcomes | 23 August 2024 (records from January 2014 onward) | 6 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.