Question · asked by 1 review
Branemark Mark III turned titanium implants vs Branemark Mark III TiUnite oxidised implants: Implant failure
- Population
- Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year
- Intervention
- Branemark Mark III turned titanium implants
- Comparison
- Branemark Mark III TiUnite oxidised implants
- Outcome
- Implant failure
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Branemark Mark III turned titanium implants vs Branemark Mark III TiUnite oxidised implants Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed dental implants, functionally loaded and followed… · 1 year Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | No failures (Froberg 2006, Table 1); risk ratio not estimable | 1 study · 15 participants | GRADE not reported |
Branemark Mark III turned titanium implants vs Branemark Mark III TiUnite oxidised implants Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for… · 1 year Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003815.PUB3, superseded | No withdrawals or failures; risk ratio not estimable (Froberg 2006) | 1 study · 15 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.