Question · asked by 1 review

Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs No sealant (control/no treatment): Mean caries increment (mean number of new cavitated occlusal lesions)

Population
Children with caries-free or non-cavitated carious lesion primary molars, aged 3-7 years (paediatric department, dental hospital, France)
Intervention
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant
Comparison
No sealant (control/no treatment)
Outcome
Mean caries increment (mean number of new cavitated occlusal lesions)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fluoride-releasing resin-based sealant vs No sealant (no treatment)
Mean caries increment (mean number of new cavitated occlusal lesions) · Children with caries-free or non-cavitated carious lesion primary molars, aged 3-7 years (paediatric department,… · 24 months
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
Mean number of new cavitated occlusal lesions 0.23 (SD 0.06) in sealed molars vs 0.29 (SD 0.06) in control molars (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test P = 0.42)1 study · 85 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.