Question · asked by 1 review

Multistrand stainless steel wire vs Wires of other materials (conventional stainless steel, superelastic NiTi, thermoelastic NiTi): Alignment rate

Population
People receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (upper and/or lower full arch)
Intervention
Multistrand stainless steel wire
Comparison
Wires of other materials (conventional stainless steel, superelastic NiTi, thermoelastic NiTi)
Outcome
Alignment rate

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Multistrand stainless steel wire vs Wires of other materials (conventional stainless steel, superelastic NiTi, thermoelastic NiTi)
Alignment rate · People receiving orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (upper and/or lower full arch) · 6 weeks to 6 months
Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (2024) · Cochrane All outcomes
Multistrand StSt versus other materials (conventional StSt, superelastic NiTi, thermoelastic NiTi); alignment rate not pooled due to clinical heterogeneity (Cobb 1998; Evans 1998; Quintao 2005; West 1995); results…4 studies · 281 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances
2024 · Cochrane All outcomes
2022-07-04Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.