Question · asked by 1 review
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy): Clinical morbidities (adverse effects)
- Population
- Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or complete unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate (involving the alveolar process); non-syndromic, requiring surgical correction of maxillary hypoplasia
- Intervention
- Maxillary distraction osteogenesis
- Comparison
- Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy)
- Outcome
- Clinical morbidities (adverse effects)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy) Clinical morbidities (adverse effects) · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or… · 12 months Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | SoF (Very Low): Clinical morbidities assessed with questionnaires, follow-up 12 months; risk with orthognathic surgery 3/14; risk with maxillary distraction osteogenesis 3/15; relative effect -; 29 participants (1… | 1 study · 29 participants | Very low |
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy) Clinical morbidities (adverse effects) · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or… · 12 months Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients (2016) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD010403.PUB2, superseded | SoF (Very Low): Clinical morbidities assessed with questionnaires, follow-up 12 months; risk with orthognathic surgery 3/14; risk with maxillary distraction osteogenesis 3/15; relative effect -; 29 participants (1… | 1 study · 29 participants | Very low |
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy) Adverse effects / clinical morbidities (e.g. mucosal infection, sinusitis, transection of vessels) · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients (2013) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD010403, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.