Question · asked by 1 review
Gingivitis (assessed by gingival index or WHO criteria) vs Individuals without gingivitis: Poor oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)
- Population
- Indians
- Intervention
- Gingivitis (assessed by gingival index or WHO criteria)
- Comparison
- Individuals without gingivitis
- Outcome
- Poor oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)
Results were inconsistent and certainty was very low.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Gingivitis vs No gingivitis Poor oral health-related quality of life · Indians · India Results were inconsistent and certainty was very low. Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and… (2023) All outcomes | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 943 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and Meta-analysis. 2023 All outcomes | Up to July 2022 | 41 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.