Question · asked by 1 review

Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia: Adverse events (assessed at any time during

Epidural analgesia showed no clear difference in adverse events (assessed at any time during compared with intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia
Adverse events (assessed at any time during · adults undergoing intra‐abdominal surgery (including hysterectomies, radical prostatectomies, Caesarean sections,…
Epidural analgesia showed no clear difference in adverse events (assessed at any time during compared with intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia (low certainty).
Epidural analgesia versus patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.32 [0.03, 2.95]2 studies · 101 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Epidural analgesia versus patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal surgery in adults
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.