Cochrane · systematic review · CD010434

Epidural analgesia versus patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal surgery in adults

Salicath, JH, Yeoh, ECY, Bennett, MH · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 60%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal surgery in adults

Population: adults undergoing intra‐abdominal surgery (including hysterectomies, radical prostatectomies, Caesarean sections, colorectal and upper gastrointestinal procedures)
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pain score at rest
Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia
no estimate extracted7 studies · 384 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pain score on movement
Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia
no estimate extracted2 studies · 80 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
All‐cause mortality rate at 30 days
Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia
RR 3.37 [0.72, 15.88]9 studies · 560 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Failure of analgesic technique requiring alternative approach (assessed at any time)
Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia
RR 2.48 [1.13, 5.45]10 studies · 678 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events (assessed at any time during
Epidural analgesia vs intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia
RR 0.32 [0.03, 2.95]2 studies · 101 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision