Question · asked by 1 review
Psychological interventions vs active comparators: Pulmonary exacerbations
- Population
- adults (aged 16 years and over) with CF
- Intervention
- Psychological interventions
- Comparison
- active comparators
- Outcome
- Pulmonary exacerbations
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator Pulmonary exacerbations · adults (aged 16 years and over) with CF Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 128 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Psychological interventions vs usual care · children, adolescents or adults with CF · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.