Question · asked by 1 review
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ psychosocial development RCTs: Mental development index (MDI) at 18 months
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Low‐ and middle‐income countries: Feeding vs control ‐ psychosocial development RCTs Mental Development Index (total) · Children aged 3 months to 5 years Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 113 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio‐economically disadvantaged children aged three months to… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.