Question · asked by 1 review
Occlusal splint vs no treatment: Increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth)
- Population
- People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis clinical, polysomnographic, or both
- Intervention
- Occlusal splint
- Comparison
- no treatment
- Outcome
- Increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth)
Occlusal splint showed no clear difference in increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Occlusal splint vs No treatment Increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) · People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis… · children (age 3 to 5 years) Occlusal splint showed no clear difference in increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported. Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding) (2007) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 0.20 [0.03, 1.15] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Occlusal splint vs No treatment Increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) · People with sleep bruxism (tooth grinding or clenching); children (greater than 1 year old) and adults; diagnosis… · 6 months of follow up, children (age 3 to 5 years) Occlusal splint showed no clear difference in increase in the size of wear facets (canine teeth) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported. Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding) (2007) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 0.20 [0.03, 1.15] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occlusal splints for treating sleep bruxism (tooth grinding) 2007 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2007-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.