Question · asked by 1 review
Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer: Restoration failure
- Population
- Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations
- Intervention
- Direct resin composite veneer
- Comparison
- Porcelain (indirect) veneer
- Outcome
- Restoration failure
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Direct resin composite veneer vs Porcelain (indirect) veneer Restoration failure (longevity) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate veneer restorations · 2 years Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (2004) · Cochrane All outcomes | Meijering 1998 (data by restoration, not pooled; no statistical analysis possible). Failures over 2-year follow-up: direct resin composite (n=69) 4 absolute and 14 relative failures; porcelain (n=56) 0 absolute and 3… | 1 study · 125 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2003-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect resin composite veneer · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate… · 1 review
- Direct resin composite veneer vs Indirect laminate veneer (resin composite or porcelain) · Patients with permanent anterior teeth with intrinsic staining suitable for laminate… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.