Question · asked by 1 review
Spinal manipulative therapy plus another intervention vs the intervention alone: Functional ability
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
spinal manipulative therapy plus any intervention vs the intervention alone Functional status Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Scale from: 0 to 24 (worse function). · patients with chronic LBP Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 156 participants | Low |
spinal manipulative therapy plus any intervention vs the intervention alone Functional status Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Scale from: 0 to 24 (worse function). · patients with chronic LBP Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 994 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.