Question · asked by 1 review
Acupressure vs sham control: Caesarean section
- Population
- women in the third trimester for induction of labour.
- Intervention
- Acupressure
- Comparison
- sham control
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
Acupressure showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with sham control (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acupressure vs sham control Caesarean section · women due for third trimester induction of labour Acupressure showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with sham control (moderate certainty). Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.94 [0.68, 1.3] | 2 studies · 239 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Acupressure vs sham control · pain management in labour · 1 review
- Acupressure vs usual care · pain management in labour · 1 review
- Acupressure vs combined control · pain management in labour · 1 review
- Acupressure vs usual care · women in the third trimester for induction of labour. · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.