Question · asked by 1 review
0-19 remaining teeth vs Individuals without functional edentulism: Oral health-related quality of life
- Population
- Indian elderly
- Intervention
- 0-19 remaining teeth
- Comparison
- Individuals without functional edentulism
- Outcome
- Oral health-related quality of life
Evidence on functional edentulism and OHRQoL is inconsistent across two studies (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Functional edentulism (<20 remaining teeth) vs Individuals without functional edentulism Oral health-related quality of life (dichotomous: poor vs not) · Indian elderly (>60 years) · India; community-based and institutional settings across multiple states Evidence on functional edentulism and OHRQoL is inconsistent across two studies (very low certainty). Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and… (2023) All outcomes | Functional edentulism vs none: studies show inconsistency; one study found a significant association (Pushpanjali 2013), one did not (Shivakumar 2018); 368 participants, 2 observational studies; Very low certainty (Fig… | 2 studies · 368 participants | Very low |
Functional edentulism (<20 remaining teeth) vs Individuals without functional edentulism Oral health-related quality of life (continuous), measured by GOHAI · Indian elderly (>60 years) · India; community-based and institutional settings across multiple states No significant difference in OHRQoL (GOHAI) was found for functional edentulism vs none (pooled SMD 0.31, CI includes 0); ungraded. Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and… (2023) All outcomes | SMD 0.31 [-0.37, 0.99] | 4 studies · 1146 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and Meta-analysis. 2023 All outcomes | Up to July 2022 | 41 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.