Question · asked by 1 review
Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion: Caesarean section
- Population
- pregnant women with confirmed or suspected chorioamnionitis
- Intervention
- Amnioinfusion
- Comparison
- no amnioinfusion
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
Amnioinfusion showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no amnioinfusion (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Amnioinfusion vs no amnioinfusion Caesarean section · pregnant women with confirmed or suspected chorioamnionitis Amnioinfusion showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no amnioinfusion (low certainty). Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1 [0.35, 2.83] | 1 study · 34 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.