Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine vs intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine: Seroconversion rate (after a single primary dose)
Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated… may leads to lower seroconversion rate (after a single primary dose) compared with intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated poliovirus vaccine vs intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine Seroconversion rate (after a single primary dose) · children Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional‐dose inactivated… may leads to lower seroconversion rate (after a single primary dose) compared with intramuscular inactivated poliovirus vaccine (low certainty). Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional dose versus intramuscular full dose of inactivated polio… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.3 [0.22, 0.41] | 6 studies · 2570 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equivalent schedules of intradermal fractional dose versus intramuscular full dose of inactivated polio vaccine for prevention of… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.