Question · asked by 1 review
Extra-oral pulp extirpation at day 0 vs Intra-oral pulp extirpation at day 7: Adverse effects
- Population
- People with avulsed and replanted permanent (front) teeth
- Intervention
- Extra-oral pulp extirpation at day 0
- Comparison
- Intra-oral pulp extirpation at day 7
- Outcome
- Adverse effects
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Extra-oral pulp extirpation at day 0 vs Intra-oral pulp extirpation at day 7 Adverse effects · People with avulsed and replanted permanent (front) teeth Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | Giannetti 2006 did not report this outcome; following email correspondence, authors reported no adverse effects were seen (uncertain whether formally assessed). | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Extra-oral pulp extirpation at day 0 vs Intra-oral pulp extirpation at day 7 · Children and young adults with avulsed and replanted permanent teeth · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.