Radiotherapy vs control: Progression to visual loss (loss of 3 or more lines on logMAR chart)
Radiotherapy showed no clear difference in loss of 3 or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity Measured… compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Radiotherapy vs control Loss of 3 or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity Measured using a logMAR chart · people with neovascular AMD Radiotherapy showed no clear difference in loss of 3 or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity Measured… compared with control (low certainty). Radiotherapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.82 [0.64, 1.04] | Not reported | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.