Question · asked by 1 review
Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement vs Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes): Radiographic marginal bone level
- Population
- People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis
- Intervention
- Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement
- Comparison
- Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes)
- Outcome
- Radiographic marginal bone level
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement vs Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes) Radiographic marginal bone level · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 6 months Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | No statistically significant difference for marginal bone levels; data not usable. | 1 study · 11 participants | GRADE not reported |
Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement vs Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes) Radiographic marginal bone level · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB4, superseded | No statistically significant difference for marginal bone levels; data not usable. | 1 study · 11 participants | GRADE not reported |
Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement vs Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes) Radiographic marginal bone level · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB3, superseded | No statistically significant difference for marginal bone levels; data not usable. | 1 study · 11 participants | GRADE not reported |
Air-abrasive / Vector system debridement vs Manual debridement (carbon fibre curettes) Radiographic marginal bone level · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2006) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB2, superseded | After 6 months no statistically significant difference for marginal bone levels; data could not be used (within-patient standard deviations not reported for the split-mouth study). | 1 study · 11 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.