Question · asked by 1 review

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Fluoride varnish: Caries arrestment at the tooth level

Population
Children and adults with active dental caries (aged 1-50; mostly preschool/school children with primary dentition)
Intervention
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
Comparison
Fluoride varnish
Outcome
Caries arrestment at the tooth level

In one trial, SDF increased tooth-level caries arrestment versus 5% sodium fluoride varnish (OR 4.75; ungraded subgroup).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF; 38% in most trials, 30% in three) vs Sodium fluoride varnish (5% NaF)
Caries arrestment at the tooth level · Children and adults with active dental caries (aged 1-50; mostly preschool/school children with primary dentition) · 6 to 12 months, Children/adults with dental caries; multiple countries; community/clinic care setting not clearly specified, SDF vs NAF
In one trial, SDF increased tooth-level caries arrestment versus 5% sodium fluoride varnish (OR 4.75; ungraded subgroup).
The role of silver diamine fluoride as dental caries preventive and arresting agent: a systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
OR 4.75 [1.57, 14.31]1 study · 62 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
The role of silver diamine fluoride as dental caries preventive and arresting agent: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
Not specified (publication window 2014-2024; references accessed July 2024)20Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.