Question · asked by 1 review
Guided imagery vs quiet rest: Severe pre‐eclampsia
- Population
- pregnant women (between 30 and 36 weeks’ gestation) with elevated blood pressure
- Intervention
- Guided imagery
- Comparison
- quiet rest
- Outcome
- Severe pre‐eclampsia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Guided imagery vs quiet rest Severe pre‐eclampsia · pregnant women (between 30 and 36 weeks’ gestation) with elevated blood pressure The review found no eligible studies for this question. Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.