Cochrane · systematic review · CD011337
Guided imagery for treating hypertension in pregnancy
Haruna, M, Matsuzaki, M, Ota, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library
Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
1
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 75%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Guided imagery compared to quiet rest for treating hypertension in pregnancy
Population: pregnant women (between 30 and 36 weeks’ gestation) with elevated blood pressure
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Severe hypertension Guided imagery vs quiet rest | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Severe pre‐eclampsia Guided imagery vs quiet rest | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Perinatal death (stillbirths plus deaths in the first week of life) Guided imagery vs quiet rest | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Antihypertensive drug use Guided imagery vs quiet rest | RR 1.27 [0.72, 2.22] | 1 study · 69 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision |