Question · asked by 0 reviews
Autogenous bone block from the chin vs Autogenous bone block from the chin + resorbable barrier: Prosthesis/implant failure (1 year)
- Population
- Patients with horizontally resorbed maxillary sites needing single implants
- Intervention
- Autogenous bone block from the chin
- Comparison
- Autogenous bone block from the chin + resorbable barrier
- Outcome
- Prosthesis/implant failure (1 year)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Autogenous bone block from the chin vs Autogenous bone block from the chin + resorbable barrier Prosthesis/implant failure (1 year) · Patients with horizontally resorbed maxillary sites needing single implants · Up to 1 year post-loading Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003607.PUB3, superseded | Not a single complication; no statistically significant difference (Meijndert 2007) | 1 study · 62 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Autogenous bone block from the chin vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier · Patients with horizontally resorbed maxillary sites needing single implants · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.