Question · asked by 1 review
CBT vs TRT (directive counselling and bilateral masking): Negatively biased interpretations of tinnitus
- Population
- adults with tinnitus
- Intervention
- CBT
- Comparison
- TRT (directive counselling and bilateral masking)
- Outcome
- Negatively biased interpretations of tinnitus
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CBT vs TRT (directive counselling and bilateral masking) Negatively biased interpretations of tinnitus · adults with tinnitus Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 42 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CBT vs audiological care (tinnitus education and rehabilitation · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
- CBT vs other experimental control · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
- CBT vs no treatment or waiting list · adults with tinnitus · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.