Question · asked by 1 review
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care: Physical abuse Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS; 80 items rated on a 7‐point scale)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up Physical abuse Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS; 80 items rated on a 7‐point scale) · women with intimate partner abuse Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being… (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 265 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women who experience… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.