RISPERIDONE vs haloperidol: Specific behaviour ‐ agitation
- Population
- psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
- Intervention
- RISPERIDONE
- Comparison
- haloperidol
- Outcome
- Specific behaviour ‐ agitation
It is very uncertain whether RISPERIDONE changes specific behaviour: agitation, up to 24 hours (PANSS‐PAS response) compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
RISPERIDONE vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL Specific behaviour: agitation, up to 24 hours (PANSS‐PAS response) · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) It is very uncertain whether RISPERIDONE changes specific behaviour: agitation, up to 24 hours (PANSS‐PAS response) compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: a. HALOPERIDOL (very low certainty). Risperidone for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.04 [0.86, 1.26] | 1 study · 124 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risperidone for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- RISPERIDONE vs placebo · terminally ill adults with delirium · 1 review
- RISPERIDONE vs COMBINATION: a. RISPERIDONE + OXCARBAZEPINE · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) · 1 review
- RISPERIDONE vs OLANZAPINE · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.