Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise: Number of patients who developed postoperative pulmonary complications
Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training leads to lower risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication – total compared with no exercise training (high certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise training Risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication – total · people scheduled to undergo lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer Summary of findings table ‐ Preoperative exercise training leads to lower risk of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication – total compared with no exercise training (high certainty). Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.45 [0.33, 0.61] | 9 studies · 573 participants | High |
Preoperative exercise training vs no exercise training Number of patients who developed postoperative pulmonary complications · patients scheduled to undergo lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer Preoperative exercise training may leads to lower number of patients who developed postoperative pulmonary complications compared with no exercise training (low certainty). Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD012020.PUB2, superseded | RR 0.33 [0.17, 0.61] | 4 studies · 158 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative exercise training for people with non‐small cell lung cancer 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.