Interleukin‐2 RA vs polyclonal antibody induction: Infection Number of participants diagnosed with infection
Interleukin‐2 RA showed no clear difference in infection Number of participants diagnosed with infection compared with polyclonal antibody induction (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interleukin‐2 RA vs polyclonal antibody induction Infection Number of participants diagnosed with infection · heart transplant recipients Interleukin‐2 RA showed no clear difference in infection Number of participants diagnosed with infection compared with polyclonal antibody induction (low certainty). Immunosuppressive T‐cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.85 [0.71, 1.03] | 3 studies · 155 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunosuppressive T‐cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.