Question · asked by 1 review
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction: Disease‐specific quality of life
- Population
- men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
- Intervention
- Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback
- Comparison
- no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction
- Outcome
- Disease‐specific quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction Condition‐specific quality of life: using validated questionnaires, > 6 to 12 months · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery The review found no eligible studies for this question. Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.