Same question across reviews · CL0281

intervention :: Unclassified intervention -> Caries (unspecified)

ProposalThis cluster groups questions by review type, intervention category and outcome domain. It is a proposal pending human validation, so questions in it may differ in population, comparator or timing.
Reviews
7
Questions
13
current versions
GRADE rated
6
Review overlap (CCA)
0.000
over all included studies of these reviews, not this question only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Strategies integrating oral health into primary care
Dental caries estimates · People receiving or providing primary care; all ages, ability types, and locations
Strategies to integrate oral health into primary care: a systematic review. (2023)
6 of 7 studies reported improved dental caries outcomes; 1 (Vichayanrat 2012) reported no change7 studiesUngraded
Responsive complementary feeding (RCF) vs Other models of complementary feeding
Dental caries · Healthy children aged 6–24 months in Western industrialized countries
Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other… (2022)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Food marketing exposure or greater marketing power vs No marketing, less marketing, or less powerful marketing
Dental caries · Children and adolescents aged 0-19 years · Vote counting by direction of effect
Association of Food and Nonalcoholic Beverage Marketing With Children and Adolescents' Eating Behaviors and… (2022)
Proportion 0.50 [0.09, 0.905]2 studiesVery low
Traditional screening (referral card given if the inspecting dentist judges the child needs to see a dentist) vs No screening
Prevalence of dental caries per child · School children (aged 4 to 15 years), primary and secondary schools in the UK and India
School dental screening programmes for oral health (2022) · Cochrane
Milsom 2006 measured prevalence of dental caries as mean number of teeth with active caries in primary teeth (dt) and permanent teeth (DT); post-intervention changes from baseline were not significant, and the authors…1 study · 16684 participantsUngraded
Clinical examination with 24-month recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall
Dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.05 [0.92, 1.20]1 study · 271 participantsLow
Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 6-month recall
Dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.99, 1.09]1 study · 1478 participantsModerate
Clinical examination with risk-based recall vs Clinical examination with 24-month recall
Dental caries: prevalence of moderate to extensive caries (ICDAS 3-6) · Dentate adults (aged 18 years and older) receiving dental check-ups in UK general dental practices (regular attenders) · 4 years
Recall intervals for oral health in primary care patients (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.95, 1.19]1 study · 279 participantsModerate
Personalised one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 study in children between the ages of 1 year and 6 years old reported 'statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvement' for personalised OHA but did not report usable data. Results: Lepore 2011 not estimable…1 study · 69 participantsVery low
Self-management (self-administered/self-monitored OHA) vs Professional OHA
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
No studies were found that looked at dental caries.0 studiesNo studies
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Dental caries · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 12 months
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane
SoF: 1 study in adults did not report usable data. Results: Bali 1999 (DMFT) not estimable (no usable data).1 study · 70 participantsVery low
PDHA program with robust prevention vs PDHA program or PDHA program with intensive staffing
Tooth decay-free children · Alaska children aged 5 to 18 years · 20 years
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percentage tooth decay-free >50% vs 8%1 studyUngraded
Ongoing BBTD Prevention Program vs BBTD Prevention Program discontinued in 1989
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start children · 1986 to 1994, Program discontinued
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in tooth decay rate 151 studyUngraded
Ongoing BBTD Prevention Program vs BBTD Prevention Program discontinued in 1989
Baby bottle tooth decay prevalence · Alaska Native and American Indian Head Start children · 1986 to 1994, Program maintained
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013)
Percent reduction in tooth decay rate 281 studyUngraded

Filter these questions further