Primary study · included by 1 review
Efficacy of leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on the rate of canine retraction: a split mouth, randomized controlled trial.
Kamrani 2026 · Kamrani Aastha, Khera Amit Kumar, Raghav Pradeep, et al. · The Angle orthodontist · 2026
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 2–3 months | MD 0.07 [0.03, 0.11] | 4 studies · 63 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 month | MD 0.26 [0.09, 0.44] | 4 studies · 94 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 weeks | MD 0.12 [0.09, 0.14] | 3 studies · 45 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 month | MD 0.54 [0.32, 0.76] | 5 studies · 77 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 3–4 months | MD 0.17 [0.01, 0.34] | 4 studies · 94 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months | MD 0.4 [0.18, 0.61] | 5 studies · 114 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 3–4 months | MD -0.02 [-0.17, 0.13] | 2 studies · 27 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months | MD 0.33 [0.05, 0.62] | 7 studies · 108 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 week | MD 0.04 [0.01, 0.07] | 3 studies · 45 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction i-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 2–3 months | MD 0.35 [0.1, 0.61] | 5 studies · 114 participants | Very low |
1 including review in total.