Primary study · included by 1 review
Evaluating the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin in accelerating canine retraction following upper first premolar extraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
Alomar 2025 · Alomar Abdulqader, Sleman Nadim, Hassan Hazem · Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 2–3 months | MD 0.07 [0.03, 0.11] | 4 studies · 63 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 weeks | MD 0.12 [0.09, 0.14] | 3 studies · 45 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 month | MD 0.54 [0.32, 0.76] | 5 studies · 77 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 3–4 months | MD -0.02 [-0.17, 0.13] | 2 studies · 27 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months | MD 0.33 [0.05, 0.62] | 7 studies · 108 participants | Very low |
Rate of canine retraction L-PRF vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 week | MD 0.04 [0.01, 0.07] | 3 studies · 45 participants | Low |
1 including review in total.