Primary study · included by 1 review
Effect of thermal cycling on the mechanical properties of conventional, milled, and 3D-printed base resin materials: a comparative in vitro study.
Xiao 2025 · Xiao Shuang, Zhang Ruo-Jin, Tan Fa-Bing · PeerJ · 2025
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hardness CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 2.71 [-0.90, 6.33] | 3 studies · 108 participants | GRADE not reported |
Flexural strength CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 1.05 [-0.18, 2.29] | 2 studies · 28 participants | GRADE not reported |
Hardness (Vickers, Shore, Barcol; standardized) CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | Meta-regression coefficient (beta) -0.31 | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Flexural strength CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | Meta-regression coefficient (beta) 0.32 | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Flexural strength CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 1.74 [0.82, 2.65] | 2 studies · 28 participants | GRADE not reported |
Flexural strength CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 1.10 [-0.12, 2.30] | 2 studies · 24 participants | GRADE not reported |
Flexural strength CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 1.28 [0.42, 2.14] | 3 studies · 40 participants | GRADE not reported |
Hardness CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 2.27 [-0.86, 5.40] | 3 studies · 104 participants | GRADE not reported |
Hardness (Vickers, Shore, Barcol; standardized) CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 2.92 [0.34, 5.49] | 4 studies · 124 participants | GRADE not reported |
Hardness CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 2.50 [-0.90, 5.92] | 3 studies · 96 participants | GRADE not reported |
Hardness CAD/CAM-milled resins vs 3D-printed resins (SLA/DLP) | SMD 4.00 [3.15, 4.87] | 3 studies · 64 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.