Primary study · included by 1 review
Bone age and dental age to assess criminal responsibility: Part II.
Palmela Pereira 2025 · Palmela Pereira Cristiana, Antunes Patrícia, Rodrigues Ana, et al. · International journal of legal medicine · 2025
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity at 18-year threshold Wrist-hand radiographic skeletal maturation methods (GP, TW3, AI/ML) classifying individuals as under or over 18 years vs Chronological age from verified documentation (reference standard) · 18-year age threshold | Sensitivity (%) 69.5 [61.6, 77.3] | 5 studies · 4587 participants | Very low |
Sensitivity at 18-year threshold Wrist-hand radiographic skeletal maturation methods (GP, TW3, AI/ML) classifying individuals as under or over 18 years vs Chronological age from verified documentation (reference standard) · 18-year age threshold | Sensitivity (%) 85.4 [75.7, 91.6] | 5 studies · 4587 participants | Very low |
Sensitivity at 18-year threshold Wrist-hand radiographic skeletal maturation methods (GP, TW3, AI/ML) classifying individuals as under or over 18 years vs Chronological age from verified documentation (reference standard) · 18-year age threshold | Sensitivity (%) 87.5 [71.88, 100] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Sensitivity at 18-year threshold Wrist-hand radiographic skeletal maturation methods (GP, TW3, AI/ML) classifying individuals as under or over 18 years vs Chronological age from verified documentation (reference standard) · 18-year age threshold | Sensitivity (%) 64.8 [55.1, 74.6] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.