Primary study · included by 1 review

Automatic 3-dimensional quantification of orthodontically induced root resorption in cone-beam computed tomography images based on deep learning.

Zheng 2025 · Zheng Qianhan, Ma Lei, Wu Yongjia, et al. · American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2025

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pooled sensitivity for detection of OIRR
AI models (CNN or other deep learning) applied to CBCT for detection and quantification of OIRR vs Manual CBCT interpretation or manual measurement/segmentation (reference standard)
Sensitivity 0.903 [0.818, 0.989]3 studiesModerate
Pooled sensitivity for detection of OIRR
AI models (CNN or other deep learning) applied to CBCT for detection and quantification of OIRR vs Manual CBCT interpretation or manual measurement/segmentation (reference standard)
Sensitivity 0.903 [0.818, 0.989]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Pooled sensitivity for detection of OIRR
AI models (CNN or other deep learning) applied to CBCT for detection and quantification of OIRR vs Manual CBCT interpretation or manual measurement/segmentation (reference standard)
Sensitivity 0.93 [0.89, 0.96]5 studies · 420 participantsModerate
Agreement of AI with manual quantification of OIRR (ICC)
AI models (CNN or other deep learning) applied to CBCT for detection and quantification of OIRR vs Manual CBCT interpretation or manual measurement/segmentation (reference standard)
ICC 1.0003 studies · 160 participantsHigh
Discriminative accuracy for OIRR detection (AUC)
AI models (CNN or other deep learning) applied to CBCT for detection and quantification of OIRR vs Manual CBCT interpretation or manual measurement/segmentation (reference standard)
AUC 0.9552 studiesLow

Also linked to PM41744917-P2-O1, which does not match a current question in this review.

1 including review in total.