Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different endodontic sealers: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Pandey 2024 · Pandey Ruchika, Kararia Nitin, Sharma Deepak Kumar, et al. · Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up | RR 1.05 [0.89, 1.23] | 4 studies · 199 participants | GRADE not reported |
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up | RR 0.995 [0.875, 1.132] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up | RR 1.08 [0.94, 1.24] | 4 studies · 199 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.