Primary study · included by 1 review

Mahidol Study 2: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Immature Permanent Teeth.

Theekakul 2024 · Theekakul Chayanun, Banomyong Danuchit, Osiri Sittichoke, et al. · Journal of endodontics · 2024

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Tooth survival rate
Regenerative endodontic procedures (blood clot, PRF, CaOH, TAP, MTA, FGF and others) vs None (single-arm proportions pooled across study arms) · Follow-up 12 to 52 months
Proportion 0.98 [0.96, 0.99]9 studies · 453 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp vitality recovery rate
Regenerative endodontic procedures (blood clot, PRF, CaOH, TAP, MTA, FGF and others) vs None (single-arm proportions pooled across study arms) · Follow-up 12 to 52 months
Proportion 0.21 [0.07, 0.49]4 studies · 224 participantsGRADE not reported
Pulp vitality recovery rate
Regenerative endodontic procedures (blood clot, PRF, CaOH, TAP, MTA, FGF and others) vs None (single-arm proportions pooled across study arms) · Follow-up 12 to 52 months
Proportion 0.32 [0.26, 0.39]4 studies · 224 participantsGRADE not reported
Tooth survival rate
Regenerative endodontic procedures (blood clot, PRF, CaOH, TAP, MTA, FGF and others) vs None (single-arm proportions pooled across study arms) · Follow-up 12 to 52 months
Proportion 0.98 [0.95, 0.99]9 studies · 453 participantsGRADE not reported
Clinical success rate
Regenerative endodontic procedures (blood clot, PRF, CaOH, TAP, MTA, FGF and others) vs None (single-arm proportions pooled across study arms) · Follow-up 12 to 52 months
Proportion 0.90 [0.83, 0.95]10 studies · 496 participantsGRADE not reported
Clinical success rate
Regenerative endodontic procedures (blood clot, PRF, CaOH, TAP, MTA, FGF and others) vs None (single-arm proportions pooled across study arms) · Follow-up 12 to 52 months
Proportion 0.89 [0.86, 0.91]10 studies · 496 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.