Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of the Efficacy Between Articaine and Lignocaine in Simultaneous Bilateral Orthodontic Maxillary Premolar Extractions: A Split-Mouth Comparative Study.
Krishna 2023 · Krishna Sai, Bhaskaran Rajprakash, Kumar Santhosh P, et al. · Cureus · 2023
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 8.2 [-4.76, 21.16] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 27.34 [9.52, 45.16] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 27.34 [9.52, 45.16] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 18.68 [3.05, 34.30] | 7 studies · 476 participants | Moderate |
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 10.02 [-3.71, 23.74] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.