Primary study · included by 1 review

Effect of Submucosal Injection of Platelet-rich Plasma on the Rate of Canine Retraction - A Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Study.

Arora 2023 · Arora Vinni, Sharma Rekha, Kumar Davender, et al. · Contemporary clinical dentistry · 2023

Included by

Effectiveness of different autologous platelet concentrates for orthodontic canine retraction following premolar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Arora 2023 · Table 2; Fig. 3; ref 59

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 2–3 months	MD 0.25 [0.02, 0.48]	5 studies · 100 participants	Low
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 3–4 months	MD 0.11 [0.01, 0.2]	4 studies · 69 participants	Low
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 month	MD 0.38 [0.26, 0.5]	6 studies · 110 participants	Moderate
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months	MD 0.09 [0.01, 0.17]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months	MD 0.26 [-0.12, 0.63]	6 studies · 110 participants	Very low

1 including review in total.