Primary study · included by 1 review

Five-Year Clinical Performance of Complex Class II Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations-A Retrospective Study.

Santos et al. 2023 · Santos Maria Jacinta M C, Rêgo Heleine Maria C, Siddique Imad, et al. · Dentistry journal · 2023

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Santos et al. 2023 · Table 2; Reference 16
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure (replacement, tooth/restoration fracture, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, toothache)
Composite resin restorations vs Amalgam restorations · At least 12 months follow-up (included studies followed 24 to 144 months)
RR 0.96 [0.68, 1.34]13 studiesUngraded

1 including review in total.