Primary study · included by 1 review

One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial.

Gindri 2022 · Gindri Larissa D'Olanda, Cassol Igor Perlin, Fröhlich Tatiana Tambara, et al. · Brazilian dental journal · 2022

Included by

Clinical Performance and Survival of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Posterior Restorations in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Gindri et al. 2022 · Table 2; References 17-22

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Color match (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 12 months	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 242 participants	Moderate
Color match (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 6 months	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 242 participants	Moderate
Marginal integrity (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 12 months	RD -0.02 [-0.07, 0.03]	2 studies · 242 participants	Moderate
Marginal discoloration (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 6 months	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 242 participants	Moderate
Marginal integrity (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 6 and 12 months combined	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 484 participants	Moderate
Color match (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 6 and 12 months combined	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 484 participants	Moderate
Marginal integrity (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 6 months	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 242 participants	Moderate
Marginal discoloration (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 12 months	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 242 participants	Moderate
Marginal discoloration (USPHS/FDI Charlie or score 4-5 failures) Bulk-fill resin composite (direct restoration) vs Conventional incremental resin composite · 6 and 12 months combined	RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]	2 studies · 484 participants	Moderate

1 including review in total.