Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Liang 2021 · Liang Shuran, Wang Fan, Chang Qiao, et al. · American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2021

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
ANB angle change (degrees)
Skeletally anchored facemask (miniplate or miniscrew supported) vs Tooth-anchored facemask · End of treatment (change from baseline)
MD 0.07 [-0.57, 0.72]3 studies · 118 participantsModerate
Comparison Between Skeletally-Anchored and Conventional Maxillary Protraction in Growing Class ΙΙΙ Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Liang 2021 · Table 3; Figure 6; reference list (doi 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.034)

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.