Primary study · included by 1 review
Correction to: A 12-month follow-up of primary and secondary root canal treatment in teeth obturated with a hydraulic sealer.
Bardini 2021 · Bardini Giulia, Casula Laura, Ambu Emanuele, et al. · Clinical oral investigations · 2021
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up | RR 1.05 [0.89, 1.23] | 4 studies · 199 participants | GRADE not reported |
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up | RR 0.995 [0.875, 1.132] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Periapical healing (healing success) Bioceramic sealers (e.g., BioRoot RCS, iRoot SP, Meta CeraSeal) vs Conventional sealers (AH Plus, zinc oxide-eugenol, calcium hydroxide-based) · 6 to 12 months follow-up | RR 1.08 [0.94, 1.24] | 4 studies · 199 participants | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.