Primary study · included by 1 review
Efficacy of different calcium silicate materials as pulp-capping agents: Randomized clinical trial.
Peskersoy 2021 · Peskersoy Cem, Lukarcanin Jusuf, Turkun Murat · Journal of dental sciences · 2021
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical and radiographic success Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) · 36 months | OR 2.34 [1.43, 3.84] | 2 studies · 379 participants | Ungraded |
Clinical and radiographic success Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) · 12 months | OR 4.44 [1.63, 12.07] | 3 studies · 174 participants | Ungraded |
Clinical and radiographic success Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) · >=12 months | OR 2.68 [1.7, 4.22] | 5 studies · 552 participants | Moderate |
1 including review in total.