Primary study · included by 1 review
Effect of platelet-rich plasma on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
El-Timamy 2020 · El-Timamy Ahmed, El Sharaby Fouad, Eid Faten, et al. · The Angle orthodontist · 2020
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 2–3 months | MD 0.25 [0.02, 0.48] | 5 studies · 100 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 3–4 months | MD 0.11 [0.01, 0.2] | 4 studies · 69 participants | Low |
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 0–1 month | MD 0.38 [0.26, 0.5] | 6 studies · 110 participants | Moderate |
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months | MD 0.09 [0.01, 0.17] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Rate of canine retraction PRP vs Conventional orthodontic treatment without APC, with or without placebo or sham · 1–2 months | MD 0.26 [-0.12, 0.63] | 6 studies · 110 participants | Very low |
1 including review in total.