Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Comparing zirconia to anterior strip crowns in primary anterior teeth in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Alaki et al. 2020 · Alaki Sumer M, Abdulhadi Bashaer S, AbdElBaki Medhat A, et al. · BMC oral health · 2020

PubMed 33167954 doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01305-1Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Alaki et al. 2020 · Table 2 (Included studies' characteristics); Reference [57]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Recurrent caries (crowns free of recurrent caries) Prefabricated zirconia crowns (e.g., NuSmile, Zirkiz, Kinder Krown) vs Other crowns/restorations (stainless steel crowns, pre-veneered SSC, resin composite strip crowns, glass-fiber composite crowns) · 6 months	RR 1.00 [0.97, 1.03]	2 studies · 205 participants	Ungraded
Recurrent caries (crowns free of recurrent caries) Prefabricated zirconia crowns (e.g., NuSmile, Zirkiz, Kinder Krown) vs Other crowns/restorations (stainless steel crowns, pre-veneered SSC, resin composite strip crowns, glass-fiber composite crowns) · 12 months	RR 1.03 [0.96, 1.10]	2 studies · 203 participants	Ungraded

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Alaki et al. 2020 · Table 3; Table 4; Ref 3

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.