Primary study · included by 1 review

Clinical Comparison of Three Esthetic Full-Coverage Restorations in Primary Maxillary Incisors at 12 Months.

Gill 2020 · Gill Ashley, Garcia Mariella, Won An Se, et al. · Pediatric dentistry · 2020

Included by

Effectiveness of prefabricated zirconia crowns and resin-bonded composite strip crowns in the restoration of pediatric primary anterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Gill 2020 · Fig. 3A; Table 1; Ref 13

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Crown retention Prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC) vs Resin-bonded composite strip crowns (RCSC)	RR 0.15 [0.07, 0.33]	5 studies · 820 participants	GRADE not reported
Marginal fit Prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC) vs Resin-bonded composite strip crowns (RCSC)	RR 0.50 [0.05, 8.70]	2 studies · 286 participants	GRADE not reported
Marginal fit Prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC) vs Resin-bonded composite strip crowns (RCSC)	RR 0.52 [0.23, 1.20]	2 studies · 286 participants	GRADE not reported
Color mismatch Prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC) vs Resin-bonded composite strip crowns (RCSC)	RR 0.27 [0.15, 0.47]	4 studies · 734 participants	GRADE not reported
Color mismatch Prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC) vs Resin-bonded composite strip crowns (RCSC)	RR 0.24 [0.05, 1.21]	4 studies · 734 participants	GRADE not reported
Secondary caries Prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZC) vs Resin-bonded composite strip crowns (RCSC)	RR 0.41 [0.18, 0.92]	5 studies · 636 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.