Primary study · included by 1 review

Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars.

Mathew et al. 2020 · Mathew Mebin George, Roopa Korishettar Basavaraj, Soni Ashu Jagdish, et al. · Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Mathew et al. 2020 · Table 2 (Included studies' characteristics); Reference [43]
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Crown retention
Prefabricated zirconia crowns (e.g., NuSmile, Zirkiz, Kinder Krown) vs Other crowns/restorations (stainless steel crowns, pre-veneered SSC, resin composite strip crowns, glass-fiber composite crowns) · 6 months
RR 1.02 [0.94, 1.11]3 studies · 201 participantsUngraded
Crown retention
Prefabricated zirconia crowns (e.g., NuSmile, Zirkiz, Kinder Krown) vs Other crowns/restorations (stainless steel crowns, pre-veneered SSC, resin composite strip crowns, glass-fiber composite crowns) · 12 months
RR 1.00 [0.94, 1.05]3 studies · 156 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.